Skip To Main Content

Biochemical Diagnostic Strategy in Females Suspected of Fabry Disease

Study objective and method

To demonstrate

The benefits of adding lyso-GL-3 to ► Primary diagnostic for testing for ►


Improving detection rate of potential females with FD


Avoiding unnecessary genetic testing

First large prospective study

11,948 females with suspicion of FD

tested for

Biochemical tests  

  • α-Gal A activity
  • Lyso-GL-3 levels
followed by Genetic confirmatory testing in 883 females

 

Groups

01. Low α-Gal A activity High lyso-GL-3 02. Low α-Gal A activity Normal lyso-GL-3 03. Normal α-Gal A activity High lyso-GL-3 04. Normal α-Gal A activity Normal lyso-GL-3
Classical FD very likely (n=61) Classical FD unlikely (n=184) FD very likely (n=256)  

had normal results (n=11,447*)

Genetic confirmatory test No further testing required

Results

(184/883) females were identified with one or two GLA variants.

Distribution of genetically positive samples

Better indicator of FD  

Elevated lyso-GL-3 levels (39% PPV)

>

Low α-Gal A activity (6% PPV)

Clearly negative results for both biochemical parameters:

Unlikely to have FD, even in clinically highly suspicious cases

Proposed diagnosis decision tree

STEP 2

Once enzyme deficiency is confirmed, molecular testing is performed to identify GLA genetic variants.

STEP 2

Once enzyme activity (deficient or not) together with elevated biomarker is confirmed, molecular testing is performed to identify GLA genetic variants.

Conclusion

*Mutation analysis performed in 389 cases.

α-Gal A: Alpha-galactosidase A; dbFGP: Fabry disease genotype–phenotype database; FD: Fabry disease; Lyso-GL-3: Globotriaosylsphingosine; PPV: Positive predictive value; DBS: Dried blood spotting; GLA: Galactosidase alpha; VUS: Variant of unknown significance.

MAT-BH-2400131-V1-March 2024