Skip To Main Content

ODYSSEY data mining

In a data mining study of over 3,000 patients* with ASCVD and comorbidities but no prior ACS or stroke, PRALUENT significantly reduced LDL-C levels vs. placebo (n=963) and was generally well tolerated.1

Read the full publication

Watch Prof Perrone-Filardi's summary of the study:

Study background

  • All patients with ASCVD are at very high or extreme risk of a potentially fatal CV event2
  • LDL-C is the primary target for CV risk reduction and PCSK9 inhibitors such as PRALUENT can reduce LDL-C levels when used alone or in combination with statins2,3+
  • However, data on the effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on CV risk in patients with ASCVD without prior ACS or stroke are limited1
  • This post hoc pooled analysis sought to determine the efficacy and safety of PRALUENT in ASCVD patients who had not previously experienced a CV event1

Study Details

Design

  • Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy data mined from 12 existing ODYSSEY phase 3 studies with PRALUENT

Objective

  • To determine the efficacy and safety of PRALUENT vs. placebo or ezetimibe in patients with ASCVD and comorbidities, but without previous ACS (myocardial infarction/unstable angina) or stroke!

Study groups

  • Efficacy data were analysed in three pools:
    • Pool 1: PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. ezetimibe
    • Pool 2: PRALUENT 75/150 mg QZW vs. placebo
    • Pool 3: PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W vs. placebo
  • Safety endpoints were analysed in Pool 1 and in Pools 2 and 3 combined!
  • Primary endpoints

    • Efficacy: Percentage change in calculated LDL-C level from baseline to Week 24
    • Safety: Percentage of patients who experience TEAs

    Population

    • Adults with documented ASCVD, clinical or unequivocal on imaging, and without prior ACS or stroke1
    • Subgroups of interest that were also investigated were PAD + diabetes, CAD + diabetes and clinically established CAD™

    What is data mining?

    Data mining refers to the process of extracting potentially useful information, such as patterns or relationships, from large and complex datasets.4

    Which ODYSSEY studies were mined?1

    • ALTERNATIVE
    • CHOICE II
    • COMBO I
    • COMBO II
    • DM INSULIN
    • FH I
    • FH II
    • HIGH FH
    • LONG TERM
    • MONO
    • OPTIONS I
    • OPTIONS II

    Want to learn more about PRALUENT?

    Click here to find out more

    Key baseline characteristics1

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Can you recognise very high- and extreme-risk patients like these in your practice?

    Find out more here

    Efficacy results

    Primary endpoint: PRALUENT demonstrated significant LDL-C reduction vs. placebo at leek 24 in ASCVD patients without previous ACS or stroke:1,*

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at Week 24 was -71.7 mg/dL for PRALUENT and -1.5 mg/dL for placebo.1

    The administration of PRALUENT resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels at Week 24 across all three pools:

    Change in LDL-C levels from baseline to Week 24 per study group (ITT population)1

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Secondary endpoints: from baseline to Week 12, PRALUENT was associated with a significant improvement in the percentage change in calculated LDL-C levels, ApoB and Lp(a) vs. ezetimibe or placebo1

    Least squared mean difference vs. placebo for patients treated with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W in the ITT population1

     

    PRALUENT

    (n=294)

    Placebo

    (n=148)

    Percentage change in HDL-C (± SD) Week 12 5.3 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 1.2
    Week 24 3.7 ± 0.8 -1.5 ± 1.1
    Percentage change in ApoA1 (± SD) Week 12 2.9 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 1.0
    Week 24 3.5 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 1.0
    Percentage change in ApoB (± SD) Week 12 -57.9 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 1.7
    Week 24 -53.3 ± 1.4 0.7 ± 2.0
    Percentage change in Lp(a) (± SD) Week 12 -28.7 ± 1.5 -1.7 ± 2.1
    Week 24 -30.4 ± 1.5 -4.3 ± 2.2
    Percentage change in fasting triglycerides (± SD) Week 12 -16.5 ± 1.8 3.6 ± 2.6
    Week 24 -15.1 ± 1.8 -1.0 ± 2.6

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Subgroup analyses: consistently greater LDL-C reduction with PRALUENT vs. ezetimibe or placebo achieved across patients with CAD + diabetes and established CADI

    CAD + diabetes:1

    62.6% LDL-C reduction 
    with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W (n=113) 
    vs. 7.6% increase for placebo (n=48) 
    at Week 24 (P<0.0001)

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at 
    Week 24 was -72.3 mg/dL for PRALUENT 
    and -1.8 mg/dL for placebo.1

    Established CAD:1 

    61.7% LDL-C reduction  
    with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W (n=246)  
    vs. 0.2% increase for placebo (n=114)  
    at Week 24 (P<0.0001)

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at  
    Week 24 was -73.3 mg/dL for PRALUENT  
    and -1.9 mg/dL for placebo.1

    Safety results

    PRALUENT was generally well tolerated, with a similar safety profile to control arms across all study groups

    • TEAEs were experienced by 76.5% and 74.8% of patients and SAEs were experienced by 13.7% and 15.7% of patients in the ezetimibe and PRALUENT (75/150 Q2W) groups, respectively1
    • TEAEs were experienced by 78.9% and 81.4% of patients and SAEs were experienced by 19.4% and 18.6% of patients in the placebo and PRALUENT (75/150 mg or 150 mg Q2W) groups, respectively1

    Adverse event profile for ASCVD patients with CAD or PAD + diabetes or established CAD treated with PRALUENT vs. ezetimibe and placebo1

      PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. ezetimibe PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. placebo
    PRALUENT (n=166) Ezetimibe (n=102) PRALUENT (n=468) Placebo (n=242)
    Patients with any TEAE, 
    n (%)
    124 (74.8) 78 (76.5) 381 (81.4) 191 (78.9)
    Patients with any 
    treatment-emergent SAE, 
    n (%)
    26 (15.7) 14 (13.7) 87 (18.6) 47 (19.4)
    Patients with any TEAE 
    leading to permanent treatment 
    discontinuation, n (%)
    15 (9.0) 14 (13.7) 33 (7.1) 14 (5.8)
    Patients with any TEAE 
    leading to death, n (%)
    2 (1.2) 1 (1.0) 4 (0.9) 1 (0.4)

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    PRALUENT significantly reduced LDL-C levels vs. ezetimibe and placebo and was well tolerated among patients with ASCVD without previous ACS or stroke1

    Do you know when guidelines recommend initiating a PCSKi?

    Find out more here

    Want to see more safety and efficacy data for PRALUENT?

    Find out more here

    Indication, dosing and footnotes

    This material is intended for healthcare professionals only.

    PRALUENT (alirocumab) indication5

    Primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

    PRALUENT® is indicated in adults with primary hypercholesterolaemia (heterozygous familial and non-familial) or mixed dyslipidaemia, and in paediatric patient 3 years of age and older with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) as an adjunct to diet:

    • in combination with the maximum tolerated dose of a statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapies or,
    • alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies in patients who are statin-intolerant, or for whom a statin is contraindicated

    Dosing informations5

    The recommended PRALUENT doses are 75 mg once every 2 weeks, 150 mg once every 2 weeks, 300 mg once every 4 weeks (monthly), administered subcutaneously. All doses may be used for initiation of treatment.

    The dose of PRALUENT can be individualised based on patient characteristics, such as baseline LDL-C level, goal of therapy, and response to treatment. Lipid levels can be assessed 4 to 8 weeks after treatment initiation or titration, and dose adjusted accordingly (up-titration or down-titration). Intense LDL-C reduction is expected with PRALUENT 150 mg once every 2 weeks and 300 mg once every 4 weeks (monthly), where 150 mg once every 2 weeks is the maximum dose.

    For the treatment of HeFH in paediatric patients 8 years of age and older:

    - for patients with a body weight of less than 50 kg, the recommended dose is 150 mg once every 4 weeks and, if additional LDL-C reduction is needed, a dose of 75 mg once every 2 weeks is recommended

    - for patients with a body weight of 50 kg or more, the recommended dose is 300 mg once every 4 weeks and, if additional LDL-C reduction is needed, a dose of 150 mg every 2 weeks is recommended

    *Of 3,115 very high-risk patients (including people with HeFH) and people with established CVD but without ACS or stroke, 979 had CAD or PAD + diabetes or established CAD.1

    PRALUENT is indicated in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering LDL-C levels, as an adjunct to correction of other risk factors: in combination with the maximum tolerated dose of a statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapies or alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies in patients who are statin-intolerant, or for whom a statin is contraindicated.5

    PAD + diabetes comprised patients with diabetes and a medical history of intermittent claudication together with ankle-brachial index ≤0.90, or together with peripheral revascularisation procedure/surgery, or critical limb ischaemia together with peripheral revascularisation procedure/surgery or thrombolysis. CAD + diabetes comprised patients with diabetes and a medical history of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, CAD, or coronary revascularisation. Clinically established CAD was defined as having a medical history of at least one of the following: angina pectoris, coronary angioplasty, coronary arterial stent insertion, coronary artery bypass, coronary artery surgery, coronary endarterectomy, coronary revascularisation, percutaneous coronary intervention.¹

    ¥The subgroup PAD and diabetes was not analysed as a result of the small sample size (n=64).¹

    ACS = acute coronary syndrome; Apo A1 = apolipoprotein Al; Apo B = apolipoprotein B; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BMI = body mass index; CAD = coronary artery disease; CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HbAlc = glycated haemoglobin; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HeFH = heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia; ITT = intention-to-treat; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a) = lipoprotein (a); LS = least squared; PAD = peripheral artery disease; PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; PCSK9i = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor; Q2W = every 2 weeks; SAE = serious adverse event; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; TEA = treatment-emergent adverse event.

    1. Castro Cabezas M, Orsini M, Tokgözoğlu L, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with established atherosclerotic vascular disease before the first cardiovascular event: pooled analysis of phase 3 ODYSSEY studies. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;S1933-2874(25)00482-9.
    2. Mach F, Koskinas KC, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J.2025;46(42):4359-4378.
    3. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097-2107.
    4. Yang J, Li Y, Liu Q, et al. Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era. J Evid Based Med. 2020;13(1):57-69.
    5. PRALUENT (alirocumab) Summary of Product Characteristics. Gulf: sanofi-aventis groupe; Nov 2023.
    Related articles
    MAT-KW-2600108/V1/June 2026